In my post on categories of signs, I briefly mentioned a code as something which is often needed before signs can be interpreted. Signs depend on a code within which they are situated, codes provide a framework within which signs make sense. Basically signs can only be understood if you have a familiarity with what they are signifying. For instance to the western world a laptop is instantly recognisable but to less developed countries a laptop might appear alien and strange. In theatre this is called a cultural cliche and it refers to anything that is not instantly recognisable worldwide, anything that requires a code to decipher.
A perfect example of signs needing codes to operate is in the introduction of photography into the modern world. David Chandler quotes, "Even an indexical and iconic sign such as a photograph involves a translation from three dimensions into two, and anthropologists have often reported the initial difficulties experienced by people in primal tribes in making sense of photographs and films."
Tuesday, 26 May 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment